Mike Turnbull Barambah 2025 Earthquake Sequence

Mike Turnbull (previously CQSRG 2002 to 2021) has been researching the earthquake seismicity of Eastern Central Queensland since 2002.
Mike Turnbull is a self funded, independent, non-commercial researcher.

Copyright (C) Mike Turnbull 2025 to ; all rights reserved.
Last modified 11 September 2025

CQSRG Logo
barambahspacial1
Figure 1 - The Barambah Earthquake Aftershock Area.
barambahspacial2
Figure 2 - Close focus map.
Barambah time decay timeline
Figure 3 - The Barambah aftershock decay timeline.

On 2025-08-15 at 23:49 UTC a magnitude ML5.6 earthquake occurred in the Barambah local municipality area, about 16 km south-east of the township of Goomeri in SE Queensland (See Figure 1). The shaking from this earthquake was felt strongly (MM IV) in the southern suburbs of Ipswich and very strongly (MM VI) in Noosa.

Initially detection of aftershocks relied on data from GA stations EIDS (Eidsvold, 150 km away) and BRS (Mt Nebo, NW of Brisbane, 135 km away), and ANU Seismometers in Schools station AUBSH (Beewah State High School, 100 km away). During this period only four aftershocks werer detected and located, ranging in magnitude from ML 0.6 to ML 1.0.

By 2025-08-27 Geoscience Australia staff had deployed six temporary monitoring stations in the immediate area of the initial event: stations KKV1, KKVN2, KKVN3, KKVN4, KKVN5, AND KKVN6. This allowed aftershocks of much smaller magnitudes to be detected and located, and those events are mapped in Figure 1).

The aftershock station deployment has enabled the calculation of well defined locations (for example, within error margins of 6 to 8 km for events of magnitude ML -0.3), and it seems that these events are occurring at a depth of from 10 to 15 km.

Using data from the aftershock station deployment a closely spaced group of aftershocks is forming about 5 km north-east of the location obtained for the initial earthquake before the aftershock monitoring deployment, with sporadic aftershock events occurring to the west and south at a distance of about 5 to 8 km (See Figure 2). There is one outlier about 30 km to the north-east of the main event which may or may not be considered as an aftershock. It is likely that the more precise location of the main event is within the closely grouped aftershocks, rather than where it is shown in Figure 2.

The aftershocks seem to be conforming with a SW to NE lineation suggesting a possible fault line; however, this appearance may be an artifact of the locational errors.

The aftershocks are occurring with considerable time spacing between successive events, sometimes with two or three days between events. The aftershocks are also of relatively low magnitudes (ML 1.8 to ML -0.8) (See Figure 3). This presentation is very different to that of the aftershock cum reactivation series associated with the Whitsunday Passage ML 5.8 event in 2016, and also with that of the 2015 Mt Perry ML 5.0, where in the few weeks following the main shock several aftershocks per day were being recorded.

I will update these notes and the figure images on a regulat basis as I detect and analyse future aftershock events; so, I recommend interested parties to visit this site every few days or if you want to keep informed of the events as they occur.

This analysis raises an important question!

How long previous to the ML5.6 have small events like this been occurring in this local area? It may be that what we are seeing here are NOT aftershocks at all. They may be events that have always been typical of the local area! We will NEVER know; after all, because of the close proximity of EIDS to the Yarol Block we know that it is very active in producing earthquakes of this low magnitude. Perhaps this is typical for the greater Queensland domain; or, at least, much of it.

A full cataloge of earthquakes that I have located since 2004 is available online.